Decent
For 2000, it was good. For 2004, it was okay, but the animaion wasn't flowign smoothly, so I was having a hard time keeping up with the story. Some voice acting would've helped too.
Decent
For 2000, it was good. For 2004, it was okay, but the animaion wasn't flowign smoothly, so I was having a hard time keeping up with the story. Some voice acting would've helped too.
Good in some ways
The graphics were good and it was fun to watch, but it was too short and it moved WAY too fast. It was over before I figured out what happened.
Pretty boring.
It was interesting at first, and the baby's thoughts were fun to watch, but it was boring otherwise to me.
Decent
I enjoyed the sound effecs and the opening, and the animation was good. However, I saw little else in the flash that was good.
Huh?
It was a pretty lousy flash. The animation and sound was okay at best, the concept ws okay, but the graphics and the flow were terrible. For a 4-year old flash it was okay, but by today's standards it sucked.
Decent
For sometign 4 years old, it's pretty good. Then again, anythign anti-Barney is good. Not much in it though.
Sucked
It was pretty lousy. The animation was fairly choppy, the sound didn't flow well, and tiwas confusing in general.
huh?
Again, randomness is good, but I didn't really understand what was going on at all. Weird flash at best.
Random crap = good flash
This was fun to watch, even though it was shorter than I would've liked it. As mentioned, randomness is good.
Lousy
Like you said, it is crap. The animation and sound are decent, but it generally sucked.
Retired user
Age 36, Male
Yes
U.S.
Joined on 10/20/02